
May 29, 2026
By Kennedy Zak
Key Points
✨
- The Los Angeles City Council’s ad hoc committee on Measure ULA concluded its final meeting without recommending a ballot measure to amend the “mansion tax,” as Committee Chair Ysabel Jurado expressed her belief that the city should not move forward with such a measure at this time.
- Measure ULA imposes a 4 to 5.5 percent transfer tax on Los Angeles real estate deals over certain thresholds, which Jurado defended as vital for addressing affordability, while industry players continue to call for its outright repeal.
- The tax’s impact remains debated, with varying reports on its impact to property tax revenue.
If the chair of the Los Angeles City Council’s committee on Measure ULA has her way about the future of the so-called mansion tax, the real estate industry should brace itself.
Los Angeles City Council Member Ysabel Jurado, who represents the city’s 14th District and chairs the ad hoc committee on ULA, kicked off the three-member body’s final meeting on Friday with a strong statement.
“After weeks of hearing testimony, reviewing data and listening to stakeholders across the sectors, I just don’t believe the city should move forward with a ballot measure [amending ULA] at this time,” Jurado said, offering a vague notion of adjusting the law with various administrative and technical moves instead.
…
Cityview CEO Sean Burton called the committee’s Friday decision to not recommend a ballot measure adjusting the tax “disappointing but not surprising.”
“We need less talk and more action… ULA is the number one factor why new housing isn’t being built in L.A.,” Burton said. “All Angelenos will continue to pay higher and higher rents until more housing units of all kinds can be built.”
Read more: https://therealdeal.com/la/2026/05/29/mansion-tax-reform-still-appears-a-pipe-dream/

